On F List of Movie Reviews

(For optimum viewing, adjust the zoom level of your browser to 125%.)


Flesh for Frankenstein (1973)

Rate: 5
Viewed: 11/13

FleshF
11/13: After finishing watching Blood for Dracula, I went straight for Flesh for Frankenstein.

Naturally enough, my expectations were high, but I've always preferred Dracula over Frankenstein. Just as I expected, Flesh for Frankenstein is boring, and it doesn't have the same verve as Blood for Dracula.

Joe Dallesandro and Udo Kier are the only actors worth watching, but they alone can't save the film. Arno Juerging was a lot better in the other one. Fortunately, everybody learned his lesson from Flesh for Frankenstein to improve the viewing experience for Blood for Dracula.

All in all, Flesh for Frankenstein is another dull Frankenstein picture.